A top science question the candidates for president should answer is:

Do you support defunding the NCCAM and other parts of the NIH which promote pseudoscience in the name of "alternative" medicine?

The National Center for Complementary and Alternative (NCCAM) medicine spends over $100 million per year researching "alternative" medicine. The systems studied include Homeopathy, Acupuncture, Chiropractic and many others whose basic principles contradict the fundamentals of modern science. The NCCAM's basic purpose is unscientific, it aims to "validate" these treatments. Science needs to start with "do these treatments work", and the answer clear: NO. Basic science and lots of research which has already been done agree, these treatments can't work and don't work. As a result the NCCAM funding is wasted, this is over one hundred million dollars diverted from real medical research to confusing the public about these failed "alternative" medical systems.

For more information, go here:
http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/obama-promises-156-million-to-alzheimers-but-where-will-the-money-come-from-thats-easy-the-nccam/

50 votes
Vote
Sign in
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
or sign in with
  • facebook
  • google
    Password icon
    I agree to the terms of service
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    funkotronfunkotron shared this idea  ·   ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    2 comments

    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      I agree to the terms of service
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      Submitting...
      • AnonymousAnonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        This is a terrible question, alternative medicine is a good option for many people - much more so than conventional medicine, and it is used by a large fraction of Americans already, not to mention the rest of the world. The problem is that these treatments are much cheaper than conventional medicine, and often drug free, so there are a lot of powerful entities out there, primarily the pharmaceutical industry for whom it is not in their best interest to promote these safer and often effective medical treatments.

      • AnonymousAnonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        The wording of this item is too argumentative to be included. If it could take a calmer position it might be of value.

      Feedback and Knowledge Base