What evidence would actually convince you, if it surfaced, that mitigating global warming must be a top priority?
One candidate denies the reality of global warming, the other agrees it's important but not top priority. I want them to specify what would have to happen or what would they have to find out that would make them realize it is top priority. If no amount of evidence would do it, then they need to admit this, because that would mean that they place short term political gain over even the most enormous tragedy.
Very good point. Force them into either a concession that they will never consider the evidence no matter what, so as to please their corporate masters, or name a level where we could actually expect some action.
Robert J. Kolker commented
When the Great Plains turn into a Dust Bowl.