A top science question the candidates for president should answer is:

What is your response to climate change being an existential threat to the human species?

41 votes
Vote
Sign in
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
or sign in with
  • facebook
  • google
    Password icon
    I agree to the terms of service
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    AnonymousAnonymous shared this idea  ·   ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    1 comment

    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      I agree to the terms of service
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      Submitting...
      • AnonymousAnonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Society's primary focus on economics tends to result in actions taken to yield immediate, short-term results. These actions often have unintended consequences which have significant long-term economic costs to mitigate and/or rectify, and thus negate the short-term benefits. If governments took a longer view, melding values along with economics, the debate would over the process/steps required to achieve future goals. Science has a role in defining the process and evaluating the proposed benefits. What more needs to be done on the scientific front to confirm global warming, its increasing rate of change, and its consequences?

      Feedback and Knowledge Base