A top science question the candidates for president should answer is:

How will you provide appropriate economic value to the highly-skilled STEM workers as we transition towards a knowledge-based economy?

It is undeniable that the US economy is transitioning away from traditional manufacturing jobs into highly-skilled, highly-educated STEM knowledge based jobs. However, graduate (PhD students), postdoctoral fellows, and research associates - the work horses of this 21st century scientific revolution; often have high student debt, sub-poverty wages when their actual working hours are accounted for, and little or no access to health insurance and retirement investments. These talented individuals often work all hours with dangerous chemicals and equipment yet are uncompensated. Given the low value places on our most creative and innovated minds when they are between 22 and 42, STEM fields are loosing their appeal. When a factory line worker at Ford, for example, is guaranteed a stable hourly wage, health insurance, retirement investment options, and union protection why would one become a scientist? What public policies and protections are you considering to properly value scientific researchers efforts and help them develop a stable financial future?

4 votes
Vote
Sign in
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
or sign in with
  • facebook
  • google
    Password icon
    I agree to the terms of service
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Melinda HoughMelinda Hough shared this idea  ·   ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    0 comments

    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      I agree to the terms of service
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      Submitting...

      Feedback and Knowledge Base