6 comments

Add a comment…

Sign in

prestine

Your email address

Check!

invalid email

(thinking…)

Reset

or sign in with

• 
• 

UserVoice password

Forgot password?

Create a password

Your name

I agree to the terms of service

Signed in as (Sign out)

Close

Close

Post comment Submitting...

• Kathleen Flannery commented  ·  July 27, 2012 4:54 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  I haven't heard anything from the Gates' on the subject of global warming. Didn't thing of it as among their interests.

• Elizabeth Deitch commented  ·  July 19, 2012 11:43 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Seems like Melinda is the one who's more publicly polished, perhaps they should be a team?

• Anonymous commented  ·  June 9, 2012 3:31 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Grumpy - the point of neutrality is that a moderator cannot take sides nor express his own opinion on the subject during the debate; it is otherwise not a debate between the candidates.

• Grumpy commented  ·  April 5, 2012 7:46 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  to first anonymous, 'would he remain neutral?' ... the requirement said fair, not neutral... fair like fox news does for the conservatives!
  I simply do not see him as a fit.

• Grumpy commented  ·  April 5, 2012 7:33 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  hmm I don't see Bill Gates as a good interviewer, moderator, or a draw.

• Anonymous commented  ·  April 5, 2012 6:19 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  I agree that he would be a draw. He is smarter and more public-minded than many people recognize. But would he do it - and would he remain neutral?